one joker complained in dunno straits times or streats forum regarding the need for child seat in privately owned cars. he is complaining that why is it that only privately owned cars need to obey the rule? why is it that taxis do not need to obey? his argument is that don't taxis involve in accidents that involve children as passengers also? he suggested that it should be "fairer" that taxis should also install those children seats...

i agree that taxis are similiar if not identical to cars. both also transport children passengers. so if his argument is correct then why dun we have child seat in buses? children also take buses and so buses also should have such a safety feature isn't it? if that is the case, then why is it that buses allow people to stand? shouldn't we change the law to say that "no standing passengers in buses" yah? won't those who stand be in a more dangerous position if an accident is to occur than the child in the taxi? also buses should be installed with seat belts then! bus drivers and passengers all muz fasten seat belts when travelling! so who is going to pay these increase in cost? MR.. u?? since you are so concerned about the safety of passengers in taxis, then be a kind soul and help us pay for the expenses in installing all these safety measures! if no one is allowed to stand in the bus, i dunno how many buses and bus drivers are required to cater for the new rule....

so when u argue for your own benefits, please use your pea brain and think...

also.. i see him as those idiots who want others to die with him also... just because he is suffering he wants all the others to suffer with him...

anyway.. the child seat requirement is for your child's safety. if you want to compromise it then go ahead. no one is stopping you anyway..